Monday, November 21, 2016

Fireside Chats

State of the Union Fireside Chat

The Governor of New York in 1929 faced a challenge, political opponents controlled the media. Press reports and editorial commentary consistently reflected partisan biases. He realized his continued political success required frequent direct and intimate dialogue with the electorate. Yet, his only recourse for such a dialogue was facilitated by the newspaper media!

At that juncture, the man, who would be president, implemented the new technology of "radio" that allowed him to speak directly to the populace, undistorted and unmodulated by a hostile media. His "fireside chat" communiqués continued through the traumatic days of war.

There is a man today who would be president who must also "bypass" the media of today by creatively implementing the technologies available today to engage in "fireside chats" with the electorate regarding another Leviathan "media"!

This is what a man who would be president did today, "bypass" the " Leviathan" media!


By Unknown or not provided - National Archives and Records Administration, Franklin D. Roosevelt Library (NLFDR), 4079 Albany Post Road, Hyde Park, NY, 12538-1999., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=43420258

Monday, November 14, 2016

The Old Gray Lady

New-York Daily Times, September 18, 1851.

The New York Times in a face saving Friday letter to its readers as a consequence of the "late Tuesday night" election results, allegedly "aim[s] to "rededicate [themselves] to... report ... America and the world honestly."

The NYT wrote "late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity," unfortunately the NYT no longer considers facts and accurately quintessential to journalism, had it done so it would have been unnecessary to turn on a dime to accommodate the "late Tuesday night" reality!

"The Gray Lady" then blamed Trump’s "sheer unconventionality" for the NYT's and other news outlet's failure to estimate his support, essentially conceding that the NYT is no longer a bastion of Truth amid other news outlets.

While pledging to "hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly" it exempted itself, and offered this unmerited "weasel word" commentary "We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president."

The NYT which was once known for presenting "fact" as "fact" and signing "opinion" as "opinion" concluded with this contextually ludicrous sales pitch, once again spurning the word "factual" : "We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers."

Cursory inspection of the internally conflicted letter suggests the authorship of a journalistically challenged college intern, however, the signatories are Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. Publisher, and Dean Baquet Executive Editor.

The NYT's failure to maintain the journalist standards of truth, accuracy, objectivity, fairness and public accountability, has caused truth to fall in every street in America.
"And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey: and the LORD saw it, and it displeased him that there was no judgment" (Isaiah 59:14-15).
The classic document appended below must be required reading for every student of journalism, for it chronicles the demise of "The [Old] Gray Lady"

 To our readers,

When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity. After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office? As we reflect on this week’s momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team. We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.

Sincerely, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. Publisher
Dean Baquet Executive Editor

By The New York Times - ProQuest Database, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=29474845

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Foghorn Leghorn


Foghorn Leghorn1

Couldn't help but remember the immortal words of Foghorn J. Leghorn: "I WON!" "I WON!" "I WON!" but after a bit, he contemplated: "there must have been some way I could have lost." That is how I felt listening to Trump's post election address: "There must have been some way we could have lost."

As Trump waxed ever more "conciliatory" during his victory celebration, pledging to be a president “for all Americans” and calling for unity, the "some way we could have lost" became ever more apparent as he continued "to sell out the Red States mandate" just minutes after it delivered him victory. Can't help but wonder "who gelded the fair haired stallion."

A president has NO warrant to pledge to be a president for those who by intimidation, bribery, and corruption weave the web of deception recently revealed.

A president has NO warrant to pledge to be a president for those who abhorred the Constitutional mandate of law.

And, a president has NO warrant to pledge to be a president “for all Americans”! His only oath or affirmation must be "to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the CONSTITUTION of the United States."


1Description
Foghorn Leghorn in the Looney Tunes short Foghorn Leghorn.
The short Foghorn Leghorn is copyright1947 Warner Bros.-Seven Arts, Inc.
Licensing
This image is an illustration of a character or characters in a comic book, video game, or animated television program or film. Thecopyright for it is most likely held by either thepublisher/producer and/or artist(s) producing the work in question. It is believed that the use of low-resolutionimages of character artwork: for commentary on the character or characters in question, on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profitWikimedia Foundation,
Fair use rationale in Foghorn Leghorn
Non-free media information and use rationale for Foghorn Leghorn
Description
Still image of the character, Foghorn Leghorn.
Source I don't know ([[User:|w]] was the original uploader
Article Foghorn Leghorn
Portion used Only an illustration of Leghorn, the majority of the background is cropped out.
Low resolution?
Yes, there are significant JPEG artifacts in the picture, despite its PNG format.
Purpose of use
To visually identify Foghorn Leghorn in the article Foghorn Leghorn.
Replaceable?
The "wallpapers" section of the WB's official website may contain some images illustrating Leghorn. qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.

Sunday, November 6, 2016

Googleware

Lovelace algorithm, 1843.1

Imagine the ability to abort free speech at will, and to do it dynamically and retroactively. Google has the capability to squelch internet content, such as this, using a stealth search algorithm, an algorithm adaptable to the highest bidder.

Google since inception has analyzed "every" user interaction, parsing sentences into constituent elements, e.g., nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives... compliant with grammar and punctuation, processing it with an ever-evolving proprietary ultra sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm. As with any new technology, "Googleware" can conform to either good or evil, "aye, there's the rub."

I routinely publish a variety of commentary on my Google based blogs. To verify search engine retrieval, I recently copied and entered strings of text from random posts published over a number of years. In "EVERY" case, when Google Advanced Search searched for the exact string, the link for the post immediately popped up, "EXCEPT" when the words "Clinton" or "Obama" in conjunction with a less-than flattering "adjective" were contained in the post.

Google's dynamic and retroactive search algorithm at Google's inclination prioritizes and enhances some Web content while eliminating other content from search results effectively sanctioning it to silence.

Google's search algorithm has changed the course of history in every context, contingent on the highest bidder. In a "political" context, the ramifications span the better part of two decades, with the freedom of speech the most critical casualty.


1By Ada Lovelace - http://www.sophiararebooks.com/pictures/3544a.jpg, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=37285970

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

The Gray Lady

New-York Daily Times, September 18, 1851.





The day after the 2012 election the New York Times editorialized an in your face Barack "Hussein" Obama victory after months of denial of Obama's Islamic affinity.

The newspaper that once affirmed, "Fact is presented as fact, and opinion is signed as opinion" now presents "opinion" as fact and fact as "opinion"! The bias of this "yellow rag" is editorially emblazoned for all to see, having endorsed every Democratic nominee for president since 1960! And once more "The Gray Lady" has endorsed the old gray lady!





By The New York Times - ProQuest Database, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=29474845

The Gray Lady

New-York Daily Times, 9, 18, 1851.

The day after the 2012 election the New York Times editorialized an in your face Barack "Hussein" Obama victory after months of denial of Obama's Islamic affinity.

The newspaper that once affirmed, "Fact is presented as fact, and opinion is signed as opinion" now presents "opinion" as fact and fact as "opinion"! The bias of this "yellow rag" is editorially emblazoned for all to see, having endorsed every Democratic nominee for president since 1960! And once more "The Gray Lady" has endorsed the old gray lady!





By The New York Times - ProQuest Database, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=29474845